![]() ![]() ![]() Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Vivo X90 Pro: Hardware In short: there's not much between these two, but Samsung has the slight upper hand in more display feature departments. Both Samsung and Vivo opt for 120Hz adaptive refresh rates, so you'll get smooth visuals too. In theory the Samsung panel can achieve higher peak brightness, but Vivo's measure of 1300 nits peak is no slouch. That's why the Vivo is about half a millimetre wider, the Samsung about three millimetres taller by comparison. It's a 20:9 aspect for the Vivo, a 19.3:9 one for the Samsung. There's barely any difference overall then, although the two are slightly different ratios. ![]() The Samsung is the resolution champ, though, with its 1440 x 3880 pixel panel (Vivo delivers 1260 x 2800 instead). In terms of display these two handsets are of a similar size: 6.78-inch for the Vivo X90 Pro, 6.8-inch for the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra. Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Vivo X90 Pro: Display I just think the pared-back look of the Galaxy S23 Ultra is more distinct and much prefer that it doesn't descend into the weird world of printed slogans. I'm not writing-off the Vivo's overall design, though, I suspect the textured rear will feel great, or there's a faux leather one instead, and the Zeiss badging looks classy. It also doesn't have the downright peculiar 'Xtreme Imagination' in some pseudo-handwritten font on the rear, which Vivo has inexplicably opted for on the X90 Pro. Personally I prefer how the Samsung looks. Except the Vivo X90 Pro goes with one large circular camera enclosure, which is very ono trend with Chinese phones of late, whereas the Samsung opts for five individual circular segments, no singular enclosure housing them all together, with three of those protruding from the rear. When it comes to visual aesthetic there's a circular theme on the rear of both of these phones. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |